- Genie - maillist.au.dk

No Governance Is Governance: Mapping SRM in Latin America and the Caribbean
by Benjamin Sovacool 12 Dec '25

12 Dec '25

Hi all, interesting article for those of us interested in non-WEIRD perspectives on SRM. From: María Inés Carabajal <micarabajal(a)gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2025 3:25 PM To: Sovacool, Benjamin <sovacool(a)bu.edu> Subject: Re: SRM IPCC mailing list You don't often get email from micarabajal(a)gmail.com<mailto:micarabajal@gmail.com>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Dear Dr. Sovacool, My name is María Inés Carabajal from Argentina (LA WG2 – Chapter 4 on adaptation options). It was a pleasure meeting you at the SRM marketplace. I am currently working on a project funded by the Degrees Initiative and ARIA, focused on public perceptions of SRM in Argentina, with the intention of expanding it to the wider Latin American region. We are conducting interviews and fieldwork with Argentine climate and environmental experts. As soon as we have some results, I would be delighted to share them with you. Given your expertise in the field, your insights would be extremely valuable, and I hope we might explore opportunities for collaboration in the future. We published our first article in the European Journal of Risk Regulation in May; I am attaching it here in case you find it of interest. I hope we can stay in touch. Kind regards, María Inés Carabajal

2 1

ERC Public Engagement with Research Award 2026 - Edits requested by January 9 2026
by Benjamin Sovacool 01 Dec '25

01 Dec '25

Dear GENIE comrades, I have prepared a nomination document for GENIE for the ERC Public Engagement with Research Award 2026 (see below), with help and input from our newest GENIE postdoc Abbas AbdulRaifiu. It is attached, and due January 15, so I am requesting any comments or edits by January 9. Just make them directly here, which should be editable and open to everyone: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0jurrgloct4k48r4h9og6/ERC-Award-Draft-120125… When drafting this, I was struck with just how much GENIE has accomplished, from SHARD and HATCH to our focus groups/surveys and the Knowledge Hub and various efforts at dissemination. I think we have a genuine chance of winning this. With best wishes from Paris, Benjamin From: ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION(a)ec.europa.eu<mailto:ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION@ec.europa.eu> <ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION(a)ec.europa.eu<mailto:ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION@ec.europa.eu>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 4:08 AM To: Benjamin Sovacool <benjaminso(a)hih.au.dk<mailto:benjaminso@hih.au.dk>> Subject: ERC Public Engagement with Research Award 2026 Dear Benjamin Sovacool, I am pleased to inform you that the ERC Public Engagement with Research Award 2026 call has been launched. The award will recognise ERC-funded researchers who successfully engage audiences outside their field with their research. By “public engagement” we mean the involvement of the public in the design, conduct or dissemination of activities funded by the ERC. Engagement is a two-way process, involving interaction and mutual understanding for mutual benefit. Eight prizes will be awarded, each valued at €10 000. If you want to have an idea of what types of projects were successful in the past, you can find articles about them<https://erc.europa.eu/manage-your-project/public-engagement-research-award#…> on the ERC website and short video interviews available in the science communication playlist<https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtv6FnsXqnXCcgQQXjqWEPG2Ekqc0VSO4&si=y3H…> on the ERC YouTube channel. If you have engaged with the public in the course of your ERC-funded project or up to two years following its conclusion, and if your communication activities have contributed to bringing science closer to citizens, I encourage you to apply. Best regards, Maria Leptin ERC President How to apply All relevant information is available on the ERC website<https://erc.europa.eu/manage-your-project/public-engagement-research-award> and on the ERC-2026-PERA<https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/oppor…> call published on the EU Funding and Tenders Portal website. ERC grantees with an ongoing project or a project that concluded on or after 31 December 2023 are eligible. Proposals can be submitted electronically at any time before the call deadline on 15 January 2026 at 17:00 CET (Brussels time) using the template provided in the submission system. Entries will be evaluated and selected in two rounds based on two evaluation criteria: strategy and implementation, and impact. Please consult the following document before submitting your entry: * ERC Work Programme 2026<https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/hori…> (from page 44) * Rules of Contest<https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/hori…> If you need support or advice, please contact the National Contact Point<https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/suppo…> in your country or send an email to the following address: ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION(a)ec.europa.eu<mailto:ERC-PROJECT-PROMOTION@ec.europa.eu>.

1 0

Canceling GENIE all-partner meetings in November and December?
by Benjamin Sovacool 24 Nov '25

24 Nov '25

Hi all, I'd like to propose canceling the next two monthly meetings - November 24 is the start of Thanksgiving Holiday in the United States for many of us (the holiday is on Thursday, but I myself will be on leave with my parents and brother in Colorado) and the end of December is of course winter break. I propose shifting to resume the meetings in January, where we could start the agenda again and have PIK/MCC give a possible presentation. Does this idea work for everyone? Benjamin

3 3

FW: The Royal Society’s policy briefing on Solar Radiation Modification is now available online
by Benjamin Sovacool 05 Nov '25

05 Nov '25

FYI! From: Science Policy <Science.Policy(a)royalsociety.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2025 11:02 AM Cc: Science Policy <Science.Policy(a)royalsociety.org>; Mia Kett <Mia.Kett(a)royalsociety.org> Subject: The Royal Society’s policy briefing on Solar Radiation Modification is now available online Dear All We are delighted to announce that the Royal Society’s policy briefing on Solar Radiation Modification is now available on our website<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/jTVPC2W13Upv2z1BFnfVC5Jk3-?domain=ro…>. If you have any questions about the policy briefing, please contact Mia Kett (Senior Policy Adviser) at mia.kett(a)royalsociety.org<mailto:mia.kett@royalsociety.org>. Kind regards The Royal Society

1 0

Are Carbon Offsets Fixable?
by Benjamin Sovacool 10 Oct '25

10 Oct '25

Hi all, a few of us were discussing this recent paper at the UPTAKE meeting, some sober findings about offsets for things like nature based solutions but also our ongoing discussions about durability and permanence of storage. Link below, but PDF attached for convenience. ** https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-1128… ABSTRACT This article provides a systematic review of the literature on carbon offsets. A growing number of studies have found that the most widely used offset programs continue to greatly overestimate their probable climate impact often by a factor of five to ten or more. Credit quality has remained a problem since the inception of carbon credits, despite repeated efforts to address the core challenges of additionality, leakage, double counting, environmental injustice, verification, and permanence. Combined, these issues have led many to conclude that overcrediting in carbon offsets is an intractable problem. These challenges helped stall the rapid growth in the voluntary carbon market (VCM) earlier this decade. They warrant renewed focus in the wake of COP29, where 200 nations significantly advanced the effort begun with the Paris Agreement to create the rules governing a global compliance market for carbon credits. But COP29 did not substantially address the quality problem, creating the risk the Paris compliance market will be rife with overcrediting and other problems-and that the VCM could undermine the Paris market. We recommend that all stakeholders begin focusing on high-integrity, durable carbon dioxide removal and storage, while recognizing that the recent literature has raised the question of whether durable means 100 years, 1,000 years, or longer. Ultimately, we find that many of the most popular offset project types feature intractable quality problems. We should focus on creating rules to find and fund the relatively few types of high-quality projects while employing alternative finance and strategies such as contribution claims for the critical projects in conservation, renewable energy, and sustainable development.

2 1

FW: GENIE seminar: Candelaria Bergero
by QUADE Merle 15 Sep '25

15 Sep '25

Dear all, We are pleased to announce that Candelaria Bergero (YSSP 2024) will be joining us online to present her work on the climate implications of failing to manage carbon. Please mark your calendars and join us for an exciting input and fruitful discussion. Please find the details as well as the MS Teams info below. Best, Merle on behalf of the IIASA GENIE team ________________________________ From: QUADE Merle <quade(a)iiasa.ac.at> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2025 10:18:36 AM (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna To: genie-ece <genie-ece(a)iiasa.ac.at>; SHENG Di <sheng(a)iiasa.ac.at>; SCHLEUSSNER Carl-Friedrich <schleussner(a)iiasa.ac.at>; HWONG Yi-Ling <hwong(a)iiasa.ac.at> Cc: Candelaria Bergero <bergero(a)wisc.edu>; Candelaria Bergero <candelaria.bergero(a)uci.edu>; SENGUPTA Sreyam <senguptas(a)iiasa.ac.at>; SCHEIFINGER Karl ; GASSER Thomas ; STEINHAUSER Jan ; Candelaria Bergero <mcberge1(a)uci.edu> Subject: GENIE seminar: Candelaria Bergero When: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 2:00 PM-3:00 PM. Where: G9 Meeting Room Dear GENIE team, We are pleased to announce that Candelaria Bergero (YSSP 2024) will be joining us online to present her work on the climate implications of failing to manage carbon. Please mark your calendars and join us for an exciting input and fruitful discussion. Title: The climate implications of failing to manage carbon Abstract: In scenarios that limit the increase in global mean temperature (GMT) this century to 1.5 or 2°C, large quantities of carbon are managed by both carbon capture and storage (CCS) at point sources and atmospheric carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Such carbon management may be used to offset ongoing (“residual”) emissions from hard-to-abate sectors and to decrease the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere if various feasibility and sustainability challenges are overcome. Here, in over 16 million simulations of the simple climate model MAGICC, we systematically analyze the climate implications of failing to manage carbon to the degree called for in 407 different climate mitigation scenarios. We find that entirely failing to manage carbon relates to ~0.5°C higher GMT in 2100, making it impossible to meet the 1.5°C target, but leaving 2°C in reach this century–assuming the projected decreases in emissions still occur. Our results also show that peak temperatures are especially sensitive to land-based CDR (afforestation and reforestation) that often ramps up quickly in the scenarios, whereas end-of-century temperatures depend more on levels of engineered CDR (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture with storage). What is clear, though, is that the quantity of carbon in avoided emissions is vastly larger than carbon managed in every climate mitigation scenario. Best, Merle ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help?<https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MGMxNTg0MmItMDhiMS00…> Meeting ID: 372 544 264 528 6 Passcode: NG6xq6XS ________________________________ For organizers: Meeting options<https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=80520bcd-3213-4205-…> ________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

FW: Antarctica - Government opposed to polar geoengineering
by Benjamin Sovacool 11 Sep '25

11 Sep '25

Fascinating, the UK debate continues to evolve … (and Jan and the PIK team, this does subtly signify the value to looking at European parliamentary debates to see what narratives and themes are being deployed, in my opinion, which we had proposed for WP6 😊) From: Environmental Audit Committee <EACOM(a)parliament.uk> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 7:51 AM To: Environmental Audit Committee <EACOM(a)parliament.uk> Subject: Antarctica - Government opposed to polar geoengineering House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Thursday 11 September 2025 Antarctica: Government opposed to polar geoengineering · UK also “keen to further engage” China on environmental protection in Antarctica Government response: The UK and the Antarctic environment <https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/WRGXC9gLlTk9W4VvuofEtqeJDb?domain=pu…> The Environmental Audit Committee has published the Government’s response to the Committee’s report on ‘the UK and the Antarctic environment’. In its response, the Government rejects the use of Solar Radiation Management, or ‘geoengineering’, saying the UK has no plans to deploy the technique. This week a group of 42 polar scientists published analysis which found that proposed geoengineering techniques were not feasible and could even be “environmentally dangerous”. The Government accepts many of the Committee’s other recommendations, including pressing Russia to reaffirm its commitment to the prohibition of mining and prospecting in Antarctic waters and fostering dialogue with all Antarctic Treaty System members, including China, on environmental protection and scientific cooperation. It also agrees with the Committee’s recommendation that the Government should intensify diplomatic engagement to address the concerns of China and Russia in discussions around fishing quotas and Marine Protected Areas. “The UK Government is keen to further engage China on the krill management framework and advance discussions on Marine Protected Areas and continues to seek opportunities to advance these discussions,” it says. ENDS Further information The Environmental Audit Committee considers the extent to which the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development, and to audit their performance against sustainable development and environmental protection targets. It is not a government committee but a select committee of the House of Commons with a key role in holding ministers to account. Any of our inquiries would correctly be described as a ‘parliamentary inquiry’ and not a ‘government inquiry’. Committee membership: can be found on the Committee’s website<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/J3VMC0LX1hGZXN0KTDh4t9wGI9?domain=co…>. Media enquiries: Jacob Moreton moretonj(a)parliament.uk<mailto:moretonj@parliament.uk> Specific Committee information from eacom(a)parliament.uk<mailto:eacom@parliament.uk> 020 7219 8890. Follow the Committee on X (formerly Twitter<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/XhyMCg2QrTAp1E5rc2izt43UsJ?domain=tw…>) and visit the Committee’s website<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/J3VMC0LX1hGZXN0KTDh4t9wGI9?domain=co…>. Committees are on Instagram @UKCommonsCommittees<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/a-1FCj8OxunP4o12U7sZtmGFZ4?domain=in…>. Visit parliamentlive.tv<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/ucSJCk7OyHO1y237uJtrtGkb_m?domain=pa…> to watch committees and parliamentary debates online Publications, Reports, Library research and much more can be found at www.parliament.uk<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/leQXCl7MzH2pwRqyCYuRtzGCTa?domain=pa…> For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data please see our privacy notices: www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection<https://url.uk.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/7uvaCmyMATjDoyLZFNCOtRgS8Y?domain=pa…> Your data will be held until you let us know that you wish to unsubscribe<mailto:eacomparliament.uk?subject=Unsubscribe%20from%20EAC%20list>. UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

1 0

Vienna Project Meeting - thank you and next steps
by BRUTSCHIN Elina 09 Sep '25

09 Sep '25

Dear all, Thank you once again for joining the meeting in Vienna and for being such engaged participants. I hope you all had a pleasant and safe journey home. Attached you will find the slides from the communication workshop, along with a summary of the main action items. General * Aim to continue working on the established streams and provide updates during the monthly consortium meetings. * Coordinators are responsible for scheduling follow-up online meetings with their smaller working groups. PIs should be CC’d on the invitations so that additional colleagues can join if they wish. SRM (coordinated by Yi-Ling) * Next steps: Yi-Ling to follow up with PIs & Carl to organize a call (after the Overshoot Conference) to outline the concrete steps and responsibilities across the teams for the structured SRM review. CDR Permanence Paper (coordinated by Merle) * Next steps: Merle adjusting the framing in coordination with Keywan. * Merle will follow-up with the colleagues involved so far once there is a first manuscript draft. CDR Survey (coordinated by Karl) * Next core group meeting planned in October to finalize the broader research design. CDR Portfolio & Residual Emissions (coordinated by Yoga) * Key research questions identified: * How portfolio expansion affects sectoral/regional CDR and residual emissions. * Impact of trading CDR credits vs. domestic action. * Effect of eligibility restrictions on regional deployment. * Next steps: Yoga to run agreed scenarios & create figures → share results in PPT outline → co-authors meeting to plan paper. Innovation Linkages Paper (coordinated by Finn) * Framework of linkages developed * Follow-up meetings to be scheduled In case I forgot something, please feel free to add. See you soon online! Elina on behalf of IIASA team (more pics are here<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12WpltvdJ8JYcJ3lwkEBsQS5I81GnxdRP?us…>) [cid:9b65d8e9-5198-439a-b763-49026e73ca4a]

1 0

Update & Overview of Deliverables for GENIE
by Benjamin Sovacool 01 Sep '25

01 Sep '25

Dear all, here is our updated list of tasks and deliverables as of September 2025. Let's continue to track this and discuss at our next and final meeting, most likely in Berlin/Potsdam at PIK.

1 0

Upcoming GENIE meeting at IIASA
by BRUTSCHIN Elina 31 Aug '25

31 Aug '25

Dear all, We at IIASA are already very excited to see you soon and to kick off the new school year together! We wanted to inform you that the meeting location has changed. The meeting will now be held at Webster Vienna Private University, Praterstraße 24, 1020 Vienna. This is a very central location, and given the collaborative, writing-focused style of the meeting, we thought a classroom setting with whiteboards, projectors, and breakout spaces would be ideal. Since this meeting will be work-intensive, kindly ensure you bring your laptop and charger. We will provide continuous coffee/tea and snacks (thus no clear coffee breaks) and teams take breaks as needed, and if you need to take a meeting, there will also be space available for focused work. There are plenty of nice hotels and Airbnb options nearby if you would like to adjust your accommodation. Otherwise, the venue is easily accessible from Hauptbahnhof (U1 line). Regarding social activities, we plan to focus on urban CDR and then also some communication training for policy briefs — more details will follow soon. We also suggest bringing yoga pants and/or running gear for some informal exercise sessions (more infos also to follow). While the agenda is still subject to minor changes, we wanted to share the more detailed preliminary plan with you (and what you could prepare before the meeting). As discussed during our GENIE meetings, the idea is to hold a writing-focused meeting (but can also be data analysis etc.). We will start with a brief plenary session where paper leads can pitch their paper idea, followed by dedicated time to work on the papers in smaller groups. The papers can be at different stages of development, and the goals of each group may vary. For example, if a paper is already at an advanced stage, the group lead might assign others to review specific sections. If it's still in an early phase, the team may choose to reframe the research question based on initial feedback from the full consortium etc. We have designed the meeting format to be interactive and flexible, with a balance between focused group work and opportunities for broader feedback from all participants. We will also make sure that related paper groups are spatially close to each other so that there is an opportunity to discuss some things across groups. At the top of the agenda<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WFWbamSuP_BDH_7qEufpQRg8aLwSsmCF/edit?u…>, I have included a preliminary group allocation based on the preferences that all of you submitted earlier. Please review this and feel free to make adjustments — team members can also switch groups on site. There's no obligation to stick to the proposed groups, and this setup does not affect authorship in any way, as many of you will be co-authors across multiple papers. Next Steps: If the paper leads are happy with the proposed structure, it would be great if you could prepare a 5-minute pitch for your paper to present at the beginning of the meeting. These pitches should briefly cover: * The research question * Expected outcomes of the paper * What you would like to accomplish during the meeting (where do you need support from others at this stage) I have created a <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1c7DmiuyljCykXfxPDjGy4fDxHEO_4Wwp?us…> Google Drive folder<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1c7DmiuyljCykXfxPDjGy4fDxHEO_4Wwp?us…> where you can upload your pitch presentations, any drafts, and relevant literature you would like others to review ahead of or during the meeting. We have also scheduled the usual round of updates from all teams at the beginning of the meeting. Please keep these brief and focus on recent publications and upcoming papers that might be of interest to others. In addition, we have set aside some time to reflect on the remaining deliverables — this is simply to ensure that the papers we are proposing are aligned with what is still needed. Please feel free to comment on the agenda and also let me know in case I forgot to include someone! Best regards, Elina on behalf of IIASA team

2 3